Capital Adequacy and Bank Stability in Developing Financial Systems: Cross-Country Evidence During the Basel III Implementation Phase, 2016–2024

Authors

  • Egifrida Msigwa Assistant Lecturer
  • Bahati Wilson Gabriel Assistant Lecturer
  • Amos T Kohi Assistant Lecturer

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59645/abr.v18i1.755

Keywords:

Capital adequacy; Bank stability; Basel III; CET1; Leverage ratio; Developing financial systems; System-GMM; Z-score; non-performing loans; Emerging economies

Abstract

Capital adequacy is central to post-crisis banking regulation, yet its stabilizing role in developing financial systems under Basel III remains empirically underexplored. This study examines how Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1), total capital and the leverage ratio affect bank stability during the Basel III implementation phase, 2016–2024. Using a balanced panel of 102 commercial banks from 14 developing economies in Africa, Asia and Latin America, the analysis applies a dynamic panel framework estimated with two-step System-GMM to address persistence in stability, endogeneity between capital and risk-taking, and unobserved bank heterogeneity. Bank stability is measured by the Z-score, with capital adequacy captured by CET1, total capital and leverage ratios, and controls including non-performing loans (NPLs), profitability, bank size, GDP growth and inflation. Results show that all three capital measures are positively and significantly associated with higher Z-scores, with CET1 exerting the strongest stabilizing effect, while NPLs reduce stability and profitability, size and GDP growth enhance it, and inflation weakens it. The findings indicate that capital adequacy is a necessary but insufficient pillar of bank stability in developing financial systems and must be complemented by robust credit risk management, effective supervision and supportive macroeconomic policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Admati, A. R., & Hellwig, M. (2013). The bankers’ new clothes: What’s wrong with banking and what to do about it. Princeton University Press.

Agyapong, D., & Owusu, A. (2022). Capital regulation and banking sector stability in West Africa: Post Basel III evidence. Journal of African Financial Studies, 14(2), 77–94.

Allen, F., & Carletti, E. (2022). Bank capital regulation and systemic resilience: Evidence from post crisis reforms. Journal of Financial Stability, 64, 100939.

Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.

Bank of Tanzania. (2024). Financial stability report 2024. Bank of Tanzania.

Brei, M., & Gambacorta, L. (2021). Regulatory capital, banks’ balance sheets and lending during crises: Lessons from COVID 19. BIS Working Papers, 950.

Calem, P., & Rob, R. (1999). The impact of capital based regulation on bank risk taking. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 8(4), 317–352.

Demirgüç Kunt, A., Pedraza, A., & Ruiz Ortega, C. (2022). Banking sector performance during the COVID 19 crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 137, 106441.

Diamond, D. W., & Dybvig, P. H. (1983). Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity. Journal of Political Economy, 91(3), 401–419.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

Keeley, M. C. (1990). Deposit insurance, risk, and market power in banking. American Economic Review, 80(5), 1183–1200.

Kipesha, E., & Sanga, D. (2023). Basel oriented capital requirements and bank stability in East Africa: Do bank size and ownership matter? Eastern Africa Economic Review, 9(1), 45–63.

Laeven, L., & Levine, R. (2009). Bank governance, regulation and risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2), 259–275.

Mariathasan, M., & Merrouche, O. (2023). Do stricter capital requirements reduce bank risk taking? Updated global evidence under Basel III. International Review of Economics & Finance, 88, 527–541.

Milne, A., & Whalley, A. E. (2001). Bank capital regulation and incentives for risk taking. Cass Business School Working Paper.

Munyeka, W., & Mlambo, C. (2023). Capital adequacy and bank soundness in Southern Africa: Basel III implementation outcomes. African Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 12(3), 112–129.

Mwangi, P., & Otieno, D. (2024). Capital requirements and banking sector performance in Kenya: A post Basel III assessment. African Journal of Finance and Banking Research, 6(1), 21–38.

Roodman, D. (2009). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158.

Xu, T., & Wang, Y. (2024). Basel III reforms and bank lending behaviour: Evidence from emerging Asian economies. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 60(2), 389–407.

BIS. (2019). Basel III: Finalising post crisis reforms (BCBS d424). Bank for International Settlements.

BIS. (2025). Basel III monitoring report: Highlights as of 31 December 2024 (BCBS d599). Bank for International Settlements.

FSB. (2024). Basel III implementation: Monitoring progress. Financial Stability Board.

CGD Task Force. (2019). Making Basel III work for emerging markets and developing economies. Center for Global Development.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-11

How to Cite

Msigwa, E. ., Bahati Wilson Gabriel, & Amos T Kohi. (2026). Capital Adequacy and Bank Stability in Developing Financial Systems: Cross-Country Evidence During the Basel III Implementation Phase, 2016–2024. The Accountancy and Business Review, 18(1), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.59645/abr.v18i1.755

Issue

Section

Articles