Ethical Double Standards in the Use of AI Tools in Tanzanian Higher Education: A Case of Student vs Lecturer Practices in Research Assessment

Authors

  • Jacqueline Mtui Institute of Accountancy Arusha
  • Adam Semlambo Institute of Accountancy Arusha
  • Happiness Mkumbo Institute of Accountancy Arusha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59645/tji.v6i1.768

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence in Education, Ethical Policy Enforcement, Higher Education in Tanzania, Organisational Justice Theory

Abstract

The growing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in higher education has raised ethical concerns regarding fairness in their use, particularly in developing contexts such as Tanzania, where institutional policies remain unclear and inconsistently enforced. This study examined the clarity and enforcement of AI usage policies, as well as the ethical balance between students and lecturers in research assessment, across three public universities. Using an explanatory sequential mixed-method design, the study drew from a population of 782 lecturers and over 45,000 students. Stratified sampling produced 396 student and 260 lecturer survey respondents, while qualitative data were collected through 30 interviews and six focus group discussions. Quantitative analysis revealed significant differences between students and lecturers in perceptions of policy clarity (t = −3.27, p = .001) and fairness (t = −2.98, p = .003), with respondents strongly agreeing that students are penalised more for AI use (M = 4.09). Correlation analysis showed strong relationships between policy clarity, fairness, and enforcement (r > 0.59). Qualitative findings further revealed students' fear, confusion, and mistrust regarding the use of AI in academic work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adewuisi, M. A., Ainebyoona, C., & Odekeye, O. (2025). AI in Universities: The Good, the Bot, and the Ugly Truths. ResearchSquare. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392723017_AI_in_Universities_The_Good_the_Bot_and_the_Ugly_Truths

Ahmed, A. B., King, B. D., Hiran, K. K., & Dadhich, M. (2025). Half a decade of artificial intelligence in education in Africa: Trends, opportunities, challenges and future direc-tions. Journal of Engineering Education and Technology. https://journaleet.in/index.php/jeet/article/view/2376

Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the Technology Acceptance Model in understanding academics’ behavioural intention to use learning management systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1), 143–155. https://thesai.org/Publications/ViewPaper?Volume=5&Issue=1&Code=IJACSA&SerialNo=20

Almaiah, M. A., Al Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical chal-lengesa nd factors influencing the E-learning system usage during the COVID-19 pandemic. Edu cation and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y

Binamungu, A. P., Slaa, E. D., Sifueli, H. L., & Nduungile, S. G. (2024). Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Facilities as a Panacea for Promoting Quality Education in Saint Augustine University of Tanzania in Mwanza Region. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/download/124879638/Paper_15_11.3.pdf

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Colquitt, J. A., & Zipay, K. P. (2015). Justice, fairness, and employee reactions. Annual Re-view of Organisational Psychology and Organisational Behaviour, 2, 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111457

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods ap-proaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods re-search (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Cui, Y., He, W., Du, X., Zeng, M., & Liu, D. (2025). The impact of AI writing assistants on academic writing performance: From the perspective of subjectivity. International Jour-nal of Distance Education Technologies, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.391326

Greenberg, J. (1990). Organisational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600208

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? Field Meth-ods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Hwang, G.-J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and re-search issues of artificial intelligence in education. Computers & Education: Artificial In-telligence, 1, 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001

Lim, T., Gottipati, S., & Cheong, M. L. F. (2023). Ethical considerations for artificial intelli-gence in educational assessments. In Creative AI Tools and Ethical Implications in Teach-ing and Learning (pp. 32–79). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0205-7.ch003

Luckin, R. (2021). AI for Education: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/AI-for-School-Teachers/Luckin-George-Cukurova/p/book/9781032037714 Lyimo, B. J. (2023). The Double-Edged Sword of AI: How Its Use in Tanzanian Aca-demia Can Both Help and Harm. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370591607

Matto, G., & Ponera, J. M. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education Institutions in Tanzania. https://doi.org/10.38140/ijer-2025.vol7.1.13

Mtebe, J. S., Upor, R., & Raphael, C. (2025). Drivers and barriers to digital transformation in universities in Tanzania post-COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 21(2, Part 3), 86–98. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/398136517

Muhsen, D. K., & Khmas, B. F. (2025). AI-Generated Content and Academic Integrity in Higher Education: Challenges and Solutions. Journal of Technology in Information and Research. https://jtirjournal.com/index.php/jtir/article/view/5

Ndungu, J. N., & Chepsergon, A. K. (2024). Dual Role of AI in Academic Dishonesty and Integrity Management in the Institutions of Higher Learning in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Research in Education and Technology. http://blueprintacademicpublishers.com/index.php/JORET/article/view/171

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. https://www.scribd.com/document/366667341/Jum-Nunnally-Ira-Bernstein-Psychometric-Theory

Plano Clark, V. L., & Ivankova, N. V. (2016). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field. SAGE Publications. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/mono/preview/mixed-methods-research-a-guide-to-the-field.pdf#_

Schorr, A. (2023). The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and its importance for digitali-zation research: A review. In N. Gerber & V. Zimmermann (Eds.), Proceedings of the In-ternational Symposium on Technikpsychologie (TecPsy) 2023 (pp. 55–65). Technische Universität Darmstadt. https://doi.org/10.2478/9788366675896-005

Selwyn, N., & Jandrić, P. (2020). Postdigital living in the age of Covid-19: Unsettling what we see as possible. Postdigital Science and Education, 2, 989–1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00166-9

Shikokoti, H. (2025). The nexus between students' use of AI and their academic performance in higher education. International Journal of Education and Research, 13(5). https://www.ijern.com/journal/2025/May-2025/01.pdf

Spivakovsky, O. V., Omelchuk, S. A., Kobets, V. V., Valko, N. V., & Malchykova, D. S. (2023). Institutional policies on artificial intelligence in university learning, teaching and research. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 97(5), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v97i5.5395

Urassa, B. J. (2025). Process and practice of academic writing at Tanzanian higher learning institutions. ELTR Journal, 9(2), 168–175. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394649565_PROCESS_AND_PRACTICE_OF_ACADEMIC_WRITING_AT_TANZANIAN_HIGHER_LEARNING_INSTITUTION

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x

Widodo, D. S., Rachmawati, D., Wijaya, H., Maghfuriyah, A., & Udriya, U. (2025). AI Adoption in Higher Education Institutions: An Integrated TAM and TOE Model. Dinasti InInternational Journal of Education Management and Social Science, 6(2), 1029–1039. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v6i2.3645

Xue, L., Ghazali, N., & Mahat, J. (2025). Artificial Intelligence (AI) Adoption Among Teachers: A Systematic Review and Agenda for Future Research. International Journal of Tech nology in Education, 8(3), 802–824. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.1191

Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper and Row.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-06

How to Cite

Mtui, J., Semlambo, A. ., & Mkumbo, H. (2026). Ethical Double Standards in the Use of AI Tools in Tanzanian Higher Education: A Case of Student vs Lecturer Practices in Research Assessment. The Journal of Informatics, 6(1), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.59645/tji.v6i1.768

Issue

Section

Articles